Week five was just completed. District 8 cracker barrels were held this past weekend, with a good attendance at both Flandreau and Madison.
The bulk of the discussion at the cracker barrels centered around IM 22, and how to deal with the various ways of allowing it to stand or repair/replace it. As I mentioned at the open forums, I am interested in your thoughts, but some of the discussion/feedback has been threatening, and, while I try not to take things personally, some of you have resorted to attacks on me and my family. Please consider the consequences of your actions and words, as the voters of District 8 expect and deserve respectful dialogue.
I have discussed the IM 22 issue in previous columns, so I will highlight some of the legislation that is making its way through the process, in particular, bills that attempt to address the shortfalls of IM 22. Remember that there are five steps for an idea, or bill, as we call it, to become law. Most of the House bills have been considered in their respective committee, with a few left to consider this week, and then they will have to be acted on by crossover day, Feb. 23. The same goes for an idea that originates in the Senate.
SB 172 authorizes the SD Building Authority to provide for the construction of and improvements to the State Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory and infrastructure at South Dakota State University, to increase and establish certain agricultural fees, to transfer certain funds, to make an appropriation, and to declare an emergency. The Joint Appropriations will be hearing that bill this week, and I would like your feedback.
HB 1133 would require each school district to adopt a plan to provide for students with specific learning disabilities. This is a continuation of the dyslexia discussion the last two years, and has many stakeholders. I also would like some input from school board members, as well as parents of children with the above mentioned challenges.
HB 1073 would define a public official and further clarify what a gift is to that official. This is the beginning of the many bills (17 or 18) that were designed to address the intent of the passage of IM 22 last fall by the voters. This bill would keep the threshold of $100, meaning a gift of no more than $100 per year could be given by a lobbyist to a public official. It clarifies further what a gift is, as well as defines “compensation to an immediate family member,” which was a serious issue with IM 22. Many members of the Legislature have spouses who work, as we are a citizen legislature, and simply working for a school district disqualified many legislators from serving because of spousal employment, since schools have registered lobbyists in Pierre.
Please take a look at the LRC website to review the various bills that will be up for discussion. You can contact me at Leslie.Heinemann@sdlegislature.gov any time. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you in the SD House.
-
Weather
WoonsocketMarch 28, 2023, 3:05 am17°Freal feel: 19°Fhumidity: 86%wind speed: 2 mph Wwind gusts: 2 mphUpcoming Events
March 2023 SSunday MMonday TTuesday WWednesday TThursday FFriday SSaturday 26February 26, 2023 27February 27, 2023 28February 28, 2023 1March 1, 2023 2March 2, 2023 3March 3, 2023 4March 4, 2023 5March 5, 2023 6March 6, 2023 7March 7, 2023 8March 8, 2023 9March 9, 2023 10March 10, 2023 11March 11, 2023 12March 12, 2023 13March 13, 2023 14March 14, 2023 15March 15, 2023 16March 16, 2023 17March 17, 2023 18March 18, 2023 19March 19, 2023 20March 20, 2023 21March 21, 2023 22March 22, 2023 23March 23, 2023 24March 24, 2023 25March 25, 2023 26March 26, 2023 27March 27, 2023 28March 28, 2023 29March 29, 2023 30March 30, 2023 31March 31, 2023 1April 1, 2023 -
Recent Posts
Contact Us
Archives
Tweet